View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
zanthal
Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 43
Location: Northern California
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Debbie Woolf
Joined: 09 Feb 2009
Posts: 168
Location: Kent
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2010 09:34 Post subject: Re: The incredibly relatively inferior collection of Mike Maxwell |
|
|
I took a look at the link, nice set you have there, only I did say it looks similar to Ocean Jasper its not confirmed 100% ... I also see you have Blue Lace Agate, as pointed out to me recently its Chalcedony, Blue Lace Agate is a marketing term although heavily used even by professionals !
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
John S. White
Site Admin
Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 1295
Location: Stewartstown, Pennsylvania, USA
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2010 13:18 Post subject: Re: The incredibly relatively inferior collection of Mike Maxwell |
|
|
I have three observations/questions for you Zanthal.
1. I am quite sure that the jasper, if it is jasper, is not ocean jasper
2. Why do you call the one selenite instead of its proper mineral name gypsum?
3. Have you tested the "alabaster calcite" to see if it is indeed calcite and not gypsum?
_________________ John S. White
aka Rondinaire |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zanthal
Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 43
Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2010 15:25 Post subject: Re: The incredibly relatively inferior collection of Mike Maxwell |
|
|
> I took a look at the link, nice set you have there, only I did say it looks similar to Ocean > Jasper its not confirmed 100% ... I also see you have Blue Lace Agate, as pointed out to > me recently its Chalcedony, Blue Lace Agate is a marketing term although heavily used > even by professionals !
Thanks for the info. I'm beginning to see a pattern here, when the names are prettier sounding than the stones themselves, it's probably a marketing ploy.
> 1. I am quite sure that the jasper, if it is jasper, is not ocean jasper
> 2. Why do you call the one selenite instead of its proper mineral name gypsum?
> 3. Have you tested the "alabaster calcite" to see if it is indeed calcite and not gypsum?
1. It was the best answer I could come up with, so rather than leave it un-named, I took Debbie's suggestion.
2. I hadn't gotten around to changing the name after your post saying it was definitely not selenite. (I have done so now, thanks)
3. I haven't done any tests beyond scratching a small part of the surface (using tool pictured below). It scratched fairly easily, the scratchings being small chips.
Description: |
As indicated by the arrow, the awl point of my swiss army knife is what I use for scratch tests. It is stainless steel. |
|
Viewed: |
11034 Time(s) |
|
_________________ --------------------------
Go pound rocks! :0-)
-------------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zanthal
Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 43
Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2010 20:15 Post subject: Re: The incredibly relatively inferior collection of Mike Maxwell |
|
|
John,
Scratch test of the Gypsum piece helped. The egg in question, especially after comparison to photos of Alabaster Calcite makes me pretty confident with the ID.
The reddish-brown area on the bottom of the egg is puzzling. I thought at first it's iron-oxide, but it seems too orange to be so. In fact a lot of the orange coloring reminds me of Carnelian. I'm probably wrong though.
Do you have an opinion about it?
_________________ --------------------------
Go pound rocks! :0-)
-------------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John S. White
Site Admin
Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 1295
Location: Stewartstown, Pennsylvania, USA
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2010 22:04 Post subject: Re: The incredibly relatively inferior collection of Mike Maxwell |
|
|
You have used the wrong took for the scratch test. If the stone is gypsum, you can scratch it with your fingernail. If calcite a needle point will scratch it easily, usually leaving a powder which will dissolve in vinegar.
_________________ John S. White
aka Rondinaire |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zanthal
Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 43
Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2010 22:55 Post subject: Re: The incredibly relatively inferior collection of Mike Maxwell |
|
|
> You have used the wrong took for the scratch test. If the stone is gypsum, you can > scratch it with your fingernail. If calcite a needle point will scratch it easily, usually leaving > a powder which will dissolve in vinegar.
I'm not surprised. Need to get some more facts straight. I'm armed with several books from my local library now, ought to help.
We'll see about the vinegar test.
_________________ --------------------------
Go pound rocks! :0-)
-------------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|